{"id":1851,"date":"2011-12-28T05:51:56","date_gmt":"2011-12-28T05:51:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/?p=1851"},"modified":"2015-07-04T16:43:51","modified_gmt":"2015-07-04T16:43:51","slug":"identifying-innovation-and-staying-away-importance-hadeeth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/identifying-innovation-and-staying-away-importance-hadeeth.htm","title":{"rendered":"Identifying Religious Innovations and Staying Away From Them & the Importance of Hadeeth"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ Part\u00a0Six <\/strong>of a series of inspiring\u00a0articles <\/a>from a recorded lecture entitled, “Min Ma’een al-Imaam Ahmad”\u00a0(“Benefits from the Life and Works of Imam Ahmad”) by Shaykh Saalih Aal ash-Shaykh<\/strong> (may Allaah preserve him) ]<\/em><\/p>\n

Identifying Religious\u00a0Innovations and Staying Away From Them & the Importance of Hadeeth<\/strong><\/p>\n

From Imaam Ahmad’s other noteworthy sayings, may Allaah have Mercy on him, is his statement, “I do not know any people more in need of learning hadeeth than the people in our time.”<\/em><\/p>\n

They asked him, “And why is that?”<\/em><\/p>\n

He replied, “Innovation has spread, so whoever does not have the Sunnah, or the narrations, then he will fall into innovation.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Why would a person ignorant of the narrations of the Sunnah<\/em> fall into innovation? Because innovation is something beloved to a person’s soul, since the person only does it trying to get close to Allaah, the Mighty and Exalted.<\/p>\n

An example of this is what is reported about Ibn Mas’ood (may Allaah be pleased with him). He went to a gathering where one of those present would say to the rest, “Glorify Allaah 100 times,”<\/em> and they would say, “Subhaanallaah,”<\/em> 100 times. He would say, “Praise Allaah 100 times,”<\/em> and they would say, “Al-hamdu lillaah,”<\/em> 100 times. Then he would say, “Declare Allaah’s Greatness 100 times,”<\/em> and they would say, “Allaahu akbar,”<\/em> 100 times, all of this with stones in front of them to keep count with.<\/p>\n

So Ibn Mas’ood (may Allaah be pleased with him) came to them when he was informed of this. He rebuked them, saying, “Verily you people are either more rightly guided than the Companions of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam), or you are upon a branch of misguidance! These are the dishes of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam) that are not yet even broken, and his wives have not yet even passed away\u2026”<\/em> This shows that this event occurred shortly after the death of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>).<\/p>\n

They said to him, and they were good people, “O Abaa ‘Abdir-Rahmaan! We only intended good!” <\/em>They declared that they did not intend except good, to glorify Allaah, to praise Him, and to declare His Greatness. And you all know the hadeeth teaching us to do this every day. They said, “O Abaa ‘Abdir-Rahmaan! We only intended good!”<\/em><\/p>\n

Ibn Mas’ood said, “How many have intended good, but never accomplish it?” <\/em>He meant that a person must hold to the Sunnah<\/em> in his affairs, as innovation is built upon the idea of intending good, just as those people said, “We only intended good!”<\/em><\/p>\n

People intend good in every type of innovation that you see, like innovations in our belief for example, like denying some of Allaah’s Names and Attributes. You find them saying, “We were denying such and such an attribute to establish towheed.” <\/em>They were only intending good. They negated an Attribute that Allaah, the Mighty and Exalted, is worthy of, something that is part of His Perfection, while they say, “We only intended good!”<\/em> They only intended to exalt Allaah [1]. The Mu’tazilah <\/em>considered the negation of Allaah’s Attributes to be from tohweed<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Others named their negation of Allaah’s Attributes “ta’weel”<\/em> and explained them as something else. What did they intend by this? They intended to exalt Allaah, the Mighty and Exalted. However, the statement of ‘Abdullaah ibn Mas’ood applies, “How many have intended good, but never accomplish it?”<\/em><\/p>\n

Certainly this is an important principle. How can a man be saved from this? How can someone be saved from worshipping with innovation, or admiring the innovative worship of others, or approving of their novelties in worship? These acts can seem outwardly good, they can seem to be ways to get close to Allaah. Perhaps they are acts of humility, the person may even be crying. How can he be saved from this confusion? He must have knowledge of the Sunnah<\/em>, the narrations, and the statements of the people of knowledge.<\/p>\n

One of Imaam Ahmad’s companions used to sit with Al-Haarith Al-Muhaasibee [2] frequently. Imaam Ahmad’s companion said to him, “Al-Haarith is saying this and that, and he has humility in his worship, and he has great acts of worship\u2026”<\/em><\/p>\n

Ahmad said, “When does he visit you?” <\/em><\/p>\n

He replied, “He visits me after Maghrib.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Imaam Ahmad said, “Then I will also come, but allow me to sit in a place where I can hear his talk but I do not see him nor does he see me. I want to hear his talk while he does not see me.”<\/em><\/p>\n

So Imaam Ahmad went and hid himself. After praying Maghrib<\/em>, they sat down and their host brought food. Then they prayed ‘Eshaa’<\/em>, returned to the house, and sat down again. They sat for a long time and Al-Haarith did not speak. Rather he sat in humility, in a way that fear, humbleness, and humility could be felt from him.<\/p>\n

One of Al-Haarith’s companions asked him something, and then he began to talk, using good manners and softening their hearts. He continued talking as some of his companions reached states of humility, and others began to weep.<\/p>\n

The companion of Imaam Ahmad said, “Then I went to see Imaam Ahmad, and I found him crying. So I said, ‘O Abaa ‘Abdilllaah! What about this talk that you heard?’ He replied, ‘I have not heard any speech finer than this! However, do not sit with him!'”<\/em><\/p>\n

He said, “I have not heard any speech finer than this! However, do not sit with him!”<\/em> Why? Because this kind of speech had not been in accordance with the guidance of the people of the Sunnah<\/em> who preceded them. He was coming with a new manner of speech and a new manner of humility that had not been known to the scholars, a new style that the people before them had not known. So due to this, Imaam Ahmad was afraid that, with these new things, if they would have continued sitting with them, they would have strayed toward some innovation. Imaam Ahmad prohibited the people from befriending Al-Haarith and from sitting with him, due to what reached him about some of his other erroneous statements.<\/p>\n

He said, “I have not heard any speech finer than this,” <\/em>referring to the talk that affected the people’s hearts, “However, do not sit with him!”<\/em> He said that because Al-Haarith’s style of presenting knowledge was not the way of the people of knowledge.<\/p>\n

Let us return to what Imaam Ahmad said about that era, “I do not know any people in more need of learning hadeeth than the people of our time.” <\/em><\/p>\n

They asked him, “Why is that?”<\/em><\/p>\n

He replied, “Innovation has spread, so whoever does not have the Sunnah, or the narrations, will fall into innovation.”<\/em> With regard to our current condition, this is something that everyone should take note of. Because, in our times, everyone loves the Religion, everyone wants to be religious and obedient, everyone wants to have humility in their hearts.<\/p>\n

But all of this must be done according to the Sunnah<\/em>, since any act of worship that is not in accordance to the Sunnah<\/em> is rejected. Allaah, the Mighty and Exalted, says [3]:<\/p>\n

( He is the One who created\u00a0death and life\u00a0in order to test you, [to show] which of you are best in deeds )<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Al-Fudhayl ibn ‘Iyyaadh said, explaining this verse, “The best deeds are the most sincere and correct ones.”<\/em><\/p>\n

It was said, “We all know about sincerity, but what is the meaning of correctness?” <\/em><\/p>\n

He replied, “That it is in accordance with the Sunnah of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam).”<\/em> This is the meaning of the hadeeth of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>):<\/p>\n

“Whoever performs an action that is not in accordance with our affair shall have it rejected.” <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Imaam Muslim collected this hadeeth in his Saheeh<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Therefore the affairs is not simply about someone softening the people’s hearts, benefiting the people, or reminding the people of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>). “This is a fine thing, it is nothing but good,”<\/em> the people may say. It is sufficient to reject it that it is not in accordance with the Sunnah<\/em>. Why is that? Because the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), the one we take as our example, said, “Whoever performs an action that is not in accordance with our affair shall have it rejected.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

There are some actions that were invented after the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), and they are considered innovations, novelties, and misguidance. There are other actions that were introduced after the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), however the scholars do not count them among the blameworthy innovations. So what is the criterion that separates the two cases?<\/p>\n

How can a person distinguish between what is considered innovation and what is not? The distinguishing factor is this: Do you see a precedence for it in the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), or an incentive for it in the Sunnah<\/em>? If there was an incentive for it in the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>) and he did not do it, then that action is not legislated. Allaah has said [4]:<\/p>\n

( Today I have perfected for you your Religion\u2026 )<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Imaam Maalik said, “Whoever believes that there is a good innovation in the Religion, then he has accused Muhammad (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam) of betraying the trust of the message.”<\/em> And the refuge is only with Allaah.<\/p>\n

Therefore, as long as there was an incentive to do the action in the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), and in the time of the Companions, then this proves that performing the action is an innovation. Why is that? Because the incentive was present in his time, in ours, and in the times between.<\/p>\n

So this action, if it was something legislated, then it would have been legislated in the time of the Prophethood. So since it was not legislated in the time of the Prophethood, this shows it is a misguided innovation.<\/p>\n

As for the second category (of things introduced into the Religion), they are those actions that did not have an incentive for them in the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), there was nothing warranting these actions. Let us look at some examples of both the first and second categories.<\/p>\n

To mentions something well known, the first category would include the various innovative parties and gatherings, like celebrating the night of Al-Israa’ <\/em>and Al-Mi’raa<\/em>j, the night of Al-Badr<\/em>, or the birthday of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), and this is the most serious of them.<\/p>\n

What is the goal behind all of these celebrations? The intention behind them is to instill a love for the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>) in the souls of the people, and to let people hear the history of the Messenger (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), so that they will love him. These intentions are all good.<\/p>\n

But weren’t these incentives present in the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>)? The people in the time of the Companions and the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), all the Companions, all the Bedouins, all the people around Al-Madeenah, weren’t they all in need of reflecting? Didn’t they all need to love Al-Mustafaa (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>)? They were in need of that.<\/p>\n

Then why was that action not done? No doubt, abandoning certain actions is from the Religion. Just as receiving an order and obeying it is from the Religion, to avoid doing something that had an incentive in the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>) is also from the Religion. Otherwise, there would exist some things in our Religion that get us closer to Allaah, the Mighty and Exalted, that our Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>) did not convey to us.<\/p>\n

The second category includes actions that have incentives that came after the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), and there was no incentive to perform that action in the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>), or something preventing it from being done.<\/p>\n

An example of this is the compilation of the Qur’aan into one book. Another example is Taraaweeh<\/em> Prayer. The Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>) prayed with them some nights, and then left it off, fearing that it may be taken as an obligation by the people. So when he passed away (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>) and the time of ‘Umar came (may Allaah be pleased with him), there was no longer anything preventing them from the action.<\/p>\n

As for the compilation of the Qur’aan into one book, the Qur’aan was still coming down in the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>). So if it had been compiled into one book during his lifetime, then every time a new verse was revealed, they would have had to add it into the sides or bottoms of the pages, thus the mus-haf <\/em>would be in disarray.<\/p>\n

Or they would have had to rewrite the mus-haf<\/em> every time Allaah revealed a verse, as Allaah orders the affairs however he likes, they would have had to keep rewriting the mus-haf<\/em>. For this reason, Aboo Bakr (may Allaah be pleased with him), began the compilation of the Qur’aan into one book after the death of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhe wa sallam<\/em>).<\/p>\n

Therefore, what a great piece of advice Imaam Ahmad (may Allaah be pleased with him) left for us! From his advice about sticking to the Sunnah<\/em>, he said, “I do not know any people more in need of learning hadeeth than the people of our time.”<\/em> When they asked him why, he said, “Because innovation has spread.”<\/em><\/p>\n

So if that was just about innovation in teaching styles and manners, then what about those that are related to affairs of belief? For example, what about issues of leadership, issues of enjoining the good and forbidding the evil, issues of obeying the rulers and not opposing the leaders, and the likes?<\/p>\n

Many people have contradicted the Sunnah<\/em> in these affairs and followed their opinions. So for this reason, what a great need we are in for the Sunnah<\/em>! Reflect over what Imaam Ahmad said in the end of this statement, “So whoever does not have the narrations will fall into innovation.”<\/em><\/p>\n

So whoever holds to the Sunnah<\/em> and submits to the narrations, then Allaah, the Mighty and Exalted, will protect him from the newly invented matters by His Bounty and Generosity.<\/p>\n

FOOTNOTES:<\/strong><\/p>\n

[1] Based on their mistaken assumption that to say that Allaah has Attributes like speech, hearing, a hand, a foot, etc., this implies that He must be like His Creation. So based on this, they reject these Attributes, intending to glorify Allaah and clear Him from being like His Creation. Of course the correct position is to affirm the Attributes of Allaah that are mentioned in the Book and the Sunnah, they are truly His Attributes, they befit His Majesty, and they are not like the attributes of His Creation.<\/p>\n

[2] Al-Muhaasibee was a soofee ascetic from Baghdaad. Even though he was firm in some issues that were in accordance with the way of the Salaf, like how he made takfeer<\/em> of his own father because he withheld from saying that the Qur’aan is not a created thing, the scholars still warned against him and his books. Aboo Zur’ah Ar-Raazee said, “Be warned about these books! They are books of innovation and misguidance!”<\/em> Refer to Siyaru A’laam An-Nubalaa’ <\/em>(12\/110-112).<\/p>\n

[3] the meaning of Soorah Al-Mulk<\/em> (67):2<\/p>\n

[4] the meaning of Soorah Al-Maa’idah <\/em>(5):3<\/p>\n

Continue reading…<\/strong><\/em> Part\u00a0Seven –\u00a0Praying at Night\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Or go to the Index of articles<\/strong> <\/a>in this inspiring series.<\/p>\n

Translation, Titles, and Footnotes by:<\/strong> Moosaa Richardson<\/em><\/p>\n

Originally published on Bakkah.net:<\/strong> 1423-05-16<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[ Part\u00a0Six of a series of inspiring\u00a0articles from a recorded lecture entitled, “Min Ma’een al-Imaam Ahmad”\u00a0(“Benefits from the Life and Works of Imam Ahmad”) by Shaykh Saalih Aal ash-Shaykh (may Allaah preserve him) ] Identifying Religious\u00a0Innovations and Staying Away From … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[181,86,162,59],"tags":[222,215,212],"class_list":["post-1851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-biographies","category-hadeeth-studies","category-book-sunnah","category-translations","tag-hadeeth","tag-innovation","tag-saalih-aal-shaykh"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1851"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1851\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4355,"href":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1851\/revisions\/4355"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bakkah.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}